Self, peers, and assessors each grade through their own rich rubric — sub-criteria, direct ratings, and open comments — while a contribution factor rewards students who pull their weight and marks down the ones who don't.
Multiple roles · Complex rubrics · Built-in comments · Rewards and penalises fairly
Projects, presentations, portfolios, and peer review capture what exams cannot. But they are heavy to operate — and the logistics, not the pedagogy, are where courses get stuck.
Configure any assessment you can express as a rubric or checklist. IAMS collects the marks from every evaluator, reveals individual contribution, returns feedback, supports moderation, and exports auditable outcome evidence.
Set your assessment occasions, evaluator roles, and rubrics.
Each evaluator marks through their own rubric or checklist.
IAMS aggregates marks and applies the contribution factor — you moderate.
Students receive feedback; you export outcome evidence.
One configurable engine, set up entirely by you — no fixed template, no discipline lock-in.
Mix sub-rubrics, direct ratings, and comment questions on the same rubric, and reuse a saved blueprint to spin up a new one in a click.
Assign assessors by group, by rubric, or by individual student — self, peer, and group assessments are configured per student, per assessment.
A self-and-peer contribution factor reveals who contributed to a team mark — computed transparently, and always yours to override.
Self, peer, and group comments are returned to students in one unified view, with peer identities kept anonymous.
Trace every mark through averaging and weighting, moderate any result, and export the full tabulation to Excel-ready CSV.
Watch completion for every assessor and student on one dashboard, with automatic email alerts when an assessment opens or its deadline is approaching.
Any discipline, anywhere — IAMS handles any human-evaluated assessment you can express as a rubric or checklist.
A quick look at three core workspaces inside IAMS — from the admin's live dashboard to the student's own view
of their marks. Swap in your real screenshots any time by replacing the .image-placeholder blocks
below.
IAMS was first deployed to manage the complete assessment of an engineering capstone — every perspective, in one system.
IAMS proposes; you moderate and approve. Your rubrics, your decisions, your data — the platform does the work, never the judging.
IAMS is under active development. Here's what's coming next to deepen the insight you get from every assessment.
Cohort comparisons, attainment trends across terms, and configurable dashboards that go beyond today's spreadsheet exports.
AI-assisted review of marking patterns and outcome evidence — flagging inconsistencies, summarising cohort performance, and drafting feedback for markers to check and approve.
Clone a rubric, its evaluators, and its deadlines into a new term or section in one step — set it up once, reuse it every offering.
Bulk-import students, lecturers, and rubric structures from spreadsheets, and export richer, ready-to-file outcome reports beyond CSV.
IAMS is available as a subscription for institutions, programmes, and courses. We are onboarding new users now — tell us about your context and we will share pricing and set up a demo.
No commitment — this starts a conversation, not a contract.